I was simultaneously listening to this podcast about Obama's marketing strategy while perusing Sid Lee's blog. Both talk about Obama but from different perspectives. Jaffe talks about the communications strategy but Sid Lee hit the nail on the head when, in reference to his half hour "commercial" (below) they call Obama a "storyteller".
Indeed this is really what great communications are about - human stories. Tales that people can relate to.
Things are meaningless without a human context.
Brands are born from people, and draw from human relevance to be successful, politicians are brands and Obama exploited the power of the people on the ground and their stories in his campaign.
What also struck me is how this thought links to the phenomenon of "celeb". Britney Spears is hugely successful brand - and is this because we have such access to her story...and in fact, for her brand relaunch - a warts and all documentary was released and aired recently on MTV
Stars indeed have catapulted to fame after reality TV shows - after they displayed their humanity, their personality, their mistakes & their emotions on screen.
So successful brands have a sense of grounded-ness, of reality, of identity, maybe even making some mistakes along the way.
The main thing is that you have a human story that people can relate to.
Thursday, December 4, 2008
Pop up toilets that make your bum wiggle!
Just came across a fabulous example of experiential marketing.
It's a great example of pop-up marketing - who would have thought that going for a whizz could be such an great experience...certainly something to mention later to your mates.
It's a great example of pop-up marketing - who would have thought that going for a whizz could be such an great experience...certainly something to mention later to your mates.
The Power of Rituals to drive your brand
I'm currently listening to a very interesting article on Brand Fast Trackers podcast where they're talking to Martin Lindsrom author of the new book Buyology which by all accounts seems to be a very worthwhile read.
He starts off by talking about the smash-able brand, a familiar story and concept illustrated by the fact that the Coke bottle was designed to be recognisable even when smashed into many pieces.
Martin also set up an experiment with fake billboards in the LA. 1 billboard with a Marlboro cowboy on one billboard and a Marlboro logo on another. When they looked at the craving in the brain, there was much more craving when they looked at the logo free poster they craved a lot more. Consumers were turned off by the logo as they felt that they were being marketed to. Tobacco brands are the ultimate smashable brands given the stringent restrictions on the use of logos etc. They are successful because they have been smashed.
But the really interesting part of the discussion was about mirror neurons and rituals. If you've read HERD you'll be familiar with mirror neurons. Essentially it was discovered in 1989 that there are "empathy" neurons which fire when you observe someone doing something. For example if you watch a football match and your brain is scanned, your brain scan will be the same as that of the footballer.
But how do all these points link up? Well we all know how successful the iPod was in it's rapid conquest of the market and we all have noticed that the white headphones are and obvious brand statement. Apple's stroke of genius was to break the category rules by creating white headphones - they are a smashable brand. In this wa the brand is more of an experience, a tribal identity badge than a product.
Moving more towards explicit rituals Martin Lindsrom gives us an example of Corona's success with it's lime ritual. He mentions how the product also exists in a lime version but consumers still prefer the original version when they put the lime in themselves and find the product 62% tastier once they've carried out this ritual.
Essentially it's monkey see monkey do...but for us thinking, consuming monkeys it's monkey see, monkey do, monkey tells himself he's done it for himself, because it's better.
Another great example he mentions is about a large cosmetics brand he worked on and built in a particular ritual of how to apply the cream. The ritual is only 7 years old but now 91% of it's consumers use the ritual and feel that the cream works better when they do it...and with this placebo effect, it most likely does!
He starts off by talking about the smash-able brand, a familiar story and concept illustrated by the fact that the Coke bottle was designed to be recognisable even when smashed into many pieces.
Martin also set up an experiment with fake billboards in the LA. 1 billboard with a Marlboro cowboy on one billboard and a Marlboro logo on another. When they looked at the craving in the brain, there was much more craving when they looked at the logo free poster they craved a lot more. Consumers were turned off by the logo as they felt that they were being marketed to. Tobacco brands are the ultimate smashable brands given the stringent restrictions on the use of logos etc. They are successful because they have been smashed.
But the really interesting part of the discussion was about mirror neurons and rituals. If you've read HERD you'll be familiar with mirror neurons. Essentially it was discovered in 1989 that there are "empathy" neurons which fire when you observe someone doing something. For example if you watch a football match and your brain is scanned, your brain scan will be the same as that of the footballer.
But how do all these points link up? Well we all know how successful the iPod was in it's rapid conquest of the market and we all have noticed that the white headphones are and obvious brand statement. Apple's stroke of genius was to break the category rules by creating white headphones - they are a smashable brand. In this wa the brand is more of an experience, a tribal identity badge than a product.
Moving more towards explicit rituals Martin Lindsrom gives us an example of Corona's success with it's lime ritual. He mentions how the product also exists in a lime version but consumers still prefer the original version when they put the lime in themselves and find the product 62% tastier once they've carried out this ritual.
Essentially it's monkey see monkey do...but for us thinking, consuming monkeys it's monkey see, monkey do, monkey tells himself he's done it for himself, because it's better.
Another great example he mentions is about a large cosmetics brand he worked on and built in a particular ritual of how to apply the cream. The ritual is only 7 years old but now 91% of it's consumers use the ritual and feel that the cream works better when they do it...and with this placebo effect, it most likely does!
Wednesday, December 3, 2008
Obama's viral
I just came across an official Obama viral that he used during the campaign, it's just fantastic, so refreshing, so smart...it's just inspiring political marketing..
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
